President Obama has now declared himself the Supreme Judicial Authority.  Gee, who knew??

Attorney General Eric Holder announced that President Obama has now concluded the administration would no longer defend Section Three of DOMA  (Defense of Marriage Act).  Holder acknowledged that the Justice Department had previously defended DOMA in court under a “rational basis standard.”  But he said that Obama NOW believes that “a more heightened standard of scrutiny” should be required for laws involving same-sex marriage…the same standard that applies to “laws targeting minority groups with a history of discrimination.”

Keep in mind that BOTH chambers of the Congress passed DOMA by overwhelming majorities reflecting the will of the people that marriage be defined, for legal as well as policy purposes, as it always has been.  Note also that NO federal appellate court has ruled the statute unconstitutional.

This is but one more example of the Obama Modus Operandi.  Two of the most glaring examples have been the end-run he has taken with his EPA on “global warming” because he can’t get legislation passed in the Congress and the Off-Shore Drilling moratorium, even after a judge has ruled in no uncertain terms that the moratorium be lifted.

Apparently great minds think alike.

How much more, O Lord, how much more??  This is beyond absurd and is a total disregard of the US Constitution.  The President of the United States no way has the authority to declare an existing law unconstitutional.  Precedent would leave that task up to the Courts or the Congress in the case of repealing the law.  Obviously this is NOT what the Obama/Holder cabal are doing.  They are basically saying, “I don’t like this law.  It is unconstitutional.  Therefore, it will not be enforced.” 

This “logic” is one more extraordinary power-grab for this above-his-paygrade President.  Administrations change hands.  Looking ahead in less than two years when this will happen, does ANYONE really want the new President to be able to pull off this usurpation??  What would the ProgLibs do in the event President Palin (or whoever) decided she did not like Obamacare, the Dodd/Frank finance bill, or even Abortion?  Don’t agree or like this legislation?  Just don’t enforce it.

America has become accustomed to this violation of the Constitution.  It began when the DOJ refused to prosecute the New Black Panthers voter intimidation at a polling place.  The charges were on going from the Bush administration but when Holder got in they were dropped.  Guess Obama didn’t like it and I am sure Holder agreed.

Then there was that egregious Obama law suit against the State of Arizona on illegal immigration.  All America (except for “sanctuary cities and a couple of Obama bastions of ProgLib thought, ie; CA, NY, Mass to name a few) agreed with Governor Brewer.  Didn’t matter.  The lawsuit continues.

Holder’s minions are hiding behind every rock and wading every swamp in Louisiana.  They are trying to catch the Governor violating some welfare recipient’s right to vote.  That is the way Obama is.  He viciously attacks those who he feels oppose him.  Rule of Law?  What is that??

US District Judge, Roger Vinson has ruled Obamacare unconstitutional and granted “declaratory relief” to the plaintiffs in the case of Florida vs HHS.  Judge Vinson made an unwise assumption.  He believed the Executive Branch would adhere to the law.  Silly him.  Holder, in a lame stalling ruse, presented the Judge with a “Motion to Clarify.”  Guess they had some difficulty understanding what Vinson had in mind.  Judge Vinson sent back a rather terse response, which was backed up by Florida Adjutant General, Pam Bondi.

Here is what Bondi said.  “Department of Justice’s motion to clarify is merely an attempt to delay the process when the order clearly required a halt to implementation.  Judge Vinson’s order is an injunction stopping the federal government from enforcing the Affordable Care Act on 26 States.”

Obama keeps shooting himself in the foot, doesn’t he?  One interesting thing he consistently does:  he reloads FAST!  He scouted around and found another ProgLib judge that would side with him.  This judge found individual “thinking” negated the required implementation.  Novel concept, that.  Judge Vinson and AG Bondi will have none of it.  Perhaps an injunction WILL be forthcoming.

This above picture is of Florida AG, Pam Bondi.  Obama keeps making enemies of States.  The majority oppose him at every turn.  He barely carried Florida during the last election.  Any bets this will happen in 2012?  Florida has a new Governor as well as a new AG.  Florida just shot down Obama’s fast choo-choo plan and the Governor essentially told Obama what he could do with this hair-brained scheme.

I would guess Obama wants us to forget about this three branches of government and the system of checks and balances preventing one branch from usurping power.  After all, America has The Obama.  King Obama.  He is “The Won.”

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

10 Responses to “THE CHIEF MULTI-TASKER”

  1. USMC-1969 says:

    So then can we assume a Jack of all trades and master of none?

  2. Gabriel says:

    USMC…I do not think Barry has ever mastered anything much other than being an outstanding con-man.

    Check out this link. Any possibility that Obama is stalling on Libya because he thinks the Libyan international stance is to his liking?

  3. consigliere says:

    Gabriel: The Constitution is a living breathing document. A piece of paper written so long ago by men who lived a different life cannot be literally interpreted for the America that is today. Many of those who drafted the Constitution owned slaves. They would never even consider a woman voting. The bible is the same way; great historical reference but of no relevance to the world in which we live. It is allegorical. For example, how did Adam and Eve produce only two males and yet start a world population? Where did their women come from?

    I could go on but people like you could never grasp where we are coming from. I would just be wasting my time. You resent President Obama because he is black. If he were white, you would not be so venemous.


    • Examiner says:

      To those who claim, as you do, the Constitution does not fit well with life today I would suggest you have never read the document much less sought to really understand it. The means for change and/or revision was incorporated into the document. The “living breathing document” idea is equivalent to anarchy – everyone can just do what they want. If you understand world history you know that one of the first things dictators, depots and anarchists do is suspend or ignore the constitution. Confiscating firearms and restricting speech are also high on the list.

      When the argument(s) are especially weak you can count on the race card being played. Your claim about the criticism of Obama being race related was quite predictable. Contrary to your assertion regarding the criticism of Obama being race related, I submit the reason Obama was elected was because he is black. Since blacks make up about 12% of the population being black is not a guarantee of electability. Obama is being criticized because he was not at all prepared for the job and has routinely demonstrated a lack of understanding of his own country and simple incompetence. He is politically deaf and completely missed the multiple messages clearly sent to him by voters in the last general election. To put it another way, his is reach greatly exceeds his grasp. He is a serial liar and demonstrates extreme narcissistic behavior. Obama’s enemy is Obama, not whites or any other racial group.

  4. MadPole says:

    Hoe is freedom not relevant consi?
    That document is more important than ever, unless you need mama Government telling you how to think.
    I don’t care what color your crown jewel of glass is, the man is a delusional egomaniac and never should have gotten elected, thank God we got some measure to reign him in. Thank you founding fathers for being so wise as to see the day come where a despot would try to enslave us all.
    And how can you say he is black when his mama is white, he can’t dance(Jamie Foxx’s words, not mine)and he can’t dribble the pill?

  5. MadPole says:

    Oh I forgot, He must be black cause he used to sit in Reverend Wright’s church bashing whitey.

  6. Examiner says:

    Here is an example of the real reason for the “living breathing Constitution” viewpoint:

    The Constitution is not silent on President Obama’s actions. Article II, Section I spells out the presidential oath of office:

    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” Barack H. Obama took that oath -- twice -- on January 20, 2009.

    Article II, Section III is clear on the president’s relationship to US law.

    [The president] shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed

    There’s nothing in the Constitution about the president faithfully executing only the laws with which he agrees. It says nothing about the president or his attorney general being vested with the power of judicial review. That power belongs to the courts.

    Have the president and his party gone over the cliff into lawlessness by intentionally stoking a constitutional crisis while his party fosters anarchy in the states? It appears to me they have.

  7. MadPole says:

    Oh, OOOOOOOHHH, I get it, Racist means one who doesn’t lie down and take it. Thank God all those racists were there to stop the British.

  8. Gabriel says:

    Examiner…Appreciate your rebuttal. You may have scared him/her off because they ran into someone who really thinks and can defend their thoughts. Gingrich has come out strongly against this latest escapade.

    Check out what Gingrich has to say.

  9. Gabriel says:

    Mad…Unbelievable, huh? Unfortunately, we get this BS all the time. I believe Obama is setting the stage for further “changes” to laws he does not like by failing to enforce. Check out the link (above) I provided for Examiner. It puts the issue far better than I ever could.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Best CD Rates | Thanks to dcreators, Las Vegas Condo High Rises and FBF System